Straight off in the morning, Dr. Taylor facilitated the program orientation. He referenced the 36 years of NYU's Study Abroad Program in Drama Education, as well as a variety of the leaders in the field who have worked on the program in the past (Brian Way, Peter Slade, Dorothy Heathcote, etc.) and those they would have the opportunity to encounter this summer (Gavin Bolton, Cecily O'Neill, Helen Nicholson, etc.). Dr. Taylor expressed excitement to have the students on board and indicated that many had expressed similar excitement in the opening statements for their journals.
The welcome being through, Dr. Taylor turned his attention to the academic requirements and expectations for the journal and participation. He reminded students that the program was indeed compact, but reassured everyone that the staff is here to support their academic development.
Straight after the delineation of requirements, Jonathan Harden (Course Tutor) led the group in a series of
Martin Heaney first had us send an imaginary ball around the circle such that we named the person we were sending it to, in order to introduce everyone's name. The pattern was then to be remembered so we could go around a few times hearing the names and connecting them to faces.
Martin then led the group in an East-Enders Inspired game of zip-zap-bop. In this re-imagined version, zips were sent with an "Oi" of sorts - loud and argumentative at best - passed around the circle from one participant to the next (with the sound and a physical passing of the sound). Bops which traditionally block the zip and reverse the direction were replaced with "Easy!" - with inflection of "Take it easy!" and two hands up to block the motion. Zaps can usually pass the sound to someone across the circle, and here was replaced with "Take It!" which was pointedly given to someone across the space. What some know as "groovalicious" which allows the person to buy some time with a call and response was here replaced with "I am not your mother!" which everyone else in the group responded to with "Oh yes you are!" The final bit, sometimes known as "avalanche!" where everyone must scramble to a new position in the circle and the caller resumes from their new place was here replaces with "Jackie, I'm moving out!"
I led the group in a traditional name game whereby we stood in a circle and each person used their name, an adjective that started with the same first letter as that of their name, and a physical motion to join their name and adjective. After each person took their turn, the group repeated the name/adjective/motion combination, and all that came before in the order they were introduced.
Jonathan Harden then led the group in the drama game "When the big wing blows…" whereby the facilitator completes the phrase with something members of the group might have in common. For example, "When the big wind blows, it blows people who are in
Rebecca Patterson then broke the group up into five groups, each of whom had five minutes within which to make a short list of expectations for the program which would serve as a contract between the tutors and the students. These will later be typed and posted for reference. Among the common themes were being respectful, having fun, full group participation, and allotting time for reflection.
The last activity for our opening session was led by Jonathan Harden, whereby he stood in the center of the room as if to say that he were London, and indicated north, south, east, and west as distinct areas of the room. The students were then to position themselves in the room to represent where they were born, relative to the central location of
1. In the first hour of her Process Drama, Rebecca Patterson began with a series of postcards laid out on the floor--each with an image of a person (mostly from artworks).
The students were to walk around the space, looking at the images, trying to find ones they identified with. After a bit of time, Rebecca indicated that they should isolate the image that most strongly resonated with them, pick it up, and take a seat in a circle around the space. The students then worked in pairs discussing what about their image resonated with them, looking for commonalities between their selection and that of their partner. After a short time, the group was asked to share what some of their commonalities were.
2. In the next activity, each group member was given a sheet of paper which was divided into four sections.
1 - an image of a symbol to represent yoursel
2 - an image of yourself as something in nature (a tree, a lion, etc)
3 - an image or words telling about something you inherited in your family (physical attribute, talent, etc)
4 - an image or words telling about something you wish you inherited
Again, the group was broken into five groups where they can share what they put on their papers, looking for commonalities and differences.
The next step would be to have the groups create a physical image (tableau) of what they found in common within their group, but time did not permit.
Each paper was hung on a clothesline as a collection point and display of student work.
3. Status Game - playing cards are randomly distributed. Without seeing the face value of the card, the students hold the card in front of their foreheads. They are to silently interact with each other in such a way as to respond to people based on the social status they have as indicated by the value of their card (Queens and Kings as high status, and 1, 2 as lowest, and all others in between in order). By natural association, people of like status will gravitate towards each other. Just shy of time, the teacher asked the students to do thought-tracking - whereby individuals speak aloud their thoughts about how they feel in that moment ("I'm not who I thought I was," etc.) After the group has sorted itself, everyone can check to see what their card actually was. This status is the basis of character building for the role drama to follow. As such, the cards were displayed in the clothesline as well.
4. Role Drama - a map of the American continents at the turn of the last century is shared - serving as a pretext for the role drama. Rebecca referred to what B.J. Wagner identifies as "the brotherhoods" seen in Dorothy Heathcote's work, whereby the teacher needs to assess what the group has in common in order to know where to begin the drama. As these students all have been displaced (as we are on study abroad), this is the brotherhood from which this drama is to be built.
The group worked in pairs or families based on like-status to create their characters. The drama is to take place on a ship traveling from
The families and pairs created quick tableaux of what they looked like before the journey. The teacher then went in role as the ticket-taker for the ship (a sectioned off part of the room). She was very stern (as steerage passengers were somewhat considered worthless) insisting on a straight line, each passenger had to state their name, and had to present their ticket (though they were in a similar group, the status roles were still maintained). One at a time, each was given permission to board the ship - the ticket taker responding directly and appropriately to the physical actions and intonations depicting the status of a given character.
Thereafter, she asked them to get back in their groups to examine their precious items and share about them. Where did the item come from? Why was it important? The students were asked to create a short improvisation within their group, whereby they could tell the story of their object.
The teacher told the students that the passengers would have used their time on the ship to tell the stories of their family histories. Each group/family is given an opportunity to share the story of their precious item with the teacher narrating about the passage of time in between each presentation.
The narration transitions to the next activity, as does a short passage from a text about arriving at port in
Rebecca resumed the role in order to organize the passengers for immigration interview (two other tutors filled these roles). They were each individually be interviewed and the interviewer had the right to allow them entry to
After everyone's was granted permission for entry, Rebecca gave final narration indicating that they were the lucky ones, as many did not get entry (the indigent, the diseased, those without financial support).
Rebecca went round and did a final thought tracking to hear the voices of those who had just gained entry and those who were turned away. Final narration completed the story of the immigrant experience.
Precious Items are added to the clothesline and the group gathered round for a final debrief.
Overview of London Schools/Policy Documents
Rebecca Patterson gave an overview of the English school system.
The national curriculum, should address the cultural, intellectual, moral, physical and spiritual needs of children. It has been in pace since the late 1980's but is presently in flux as the system is being revamped.
Meeting with the Academic Tutors
The students met in small groups with their academic tutors to receive clarification about the assessment of their journals and participation over the course of the program. They had the opportunity to ask questions and get immediate feedback. The opening statements were also returned, with comments from both the course instructor and the academic tutor.
WOMEN BEWARE WOMEN (Royal National Theatre)
I hadn’t given much thought to the title of the Thomas Middleton piece. Had I, it would have come as no surprise that the women in this play were not to be trusted. The level to which these women would deceive one another was on a level that I was not accustomed to and as such made me interrogate the level of misogyny that must have been culturally acceptable in order for such a piece to exist without controversy. When first performed in the Jacobean age, a play scathing women as such and presented by an all-male cast would indeed have amused the minds of folk who felt that women were not to be trusted in the public sphere. The overarching message of the piece was that one should do well by others and follow the teachings of the church, or the most severe revenge from God will befall you, speaking to the coming revival of religious certitude in the English culture.
In this particular production, they set the piece at the turn of the twentieth century (as can best be assessed from the style of dress), though they elected to use a hybrid of jazz/blues/operatic music which was disjointing at best and tremendously distracting at worst. The music should have enhanced the piece, but only succeeded during the final scene which seemed deeply influenced by the television series "